[RDF] Re: RDF digest, Vol 1 #25 - 1 msg

[Dan Brickley]

> It's frustrating to constantly get more things to consider.

Yeah, but it's not all bad! Things can only get better and more
interesting. More code == more fun...

> Just as I have a clear idea how to do things, and actualy have som code,
> there comes a couple of things that could be used as a base.

Yeah, appreciate the frustration. I personally want to get on and build
higher level apps; right now I'm trying that via strawman APIs against
work-in-progress backends. By this time next year I hope we'll all have
some common base(s) to build on...

> Maby we could have used Redland.  But I feel that we should do a
> indipendant implementation and maby use those C libraries in a future
> rewrite provided they have the functions we require.

Makes sense. Dave is about to roll a release of Redland for people to play
with. Good opportunity to revisit the common APIs thread on
www-rdf-interest I think...

Dan

> http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/docs/api/index.html
> 
>